Hot Articles

Option Theory Does Not Refute Time Diversification
The Venture Capital Myth
Angel Investing: Paving the Road to Financial Hell with Good Intentions
Fidelity Magellan's Alpha over Many Managers
2011 winners can make you a 2012 loser

Books


Index Funds Book
Index Funds: The 12-Step Program for Active Investors (Hardcover)

by Mark T Hebner
ISBN: 0-9768023-0-9




see more books...

Harry M. Markowitz explains Portfolio Theory: what it is and how it's used from a top-down model from the asset classes to the investments. He covers Standard Deviation, Variance, Correlation, and Covariance. Markowitz also explains what happened in 2008 with Modern Portfolio Theory. (39 Min.)

Harry M. Markowitz - Portfolio Theory and 2008

Mark covers historic recovery patterns and probability of future returns, the risks and returns that come with big government, the role of commodities in your investments, the pros and cons of inflation-hedging securities, and an investment strategy that has been highly successful historically. (92 Min.)

Mark T. Hebner - Big Losses, Big Government and Your Investments

Harry Markowitz gives an IFA Exclusive Presentation on Portfolio Theory Vs. Financial Engineering, and Their Roles in Financial Crises. Markowitz explains the difference between Portfolio Theory and Financial Engineering. Markowitz also covers Black Monday (October 19, 1987), Long Term Capital Management, and Now. (47 Min.)

Harry Markowitz - Portfolio Theory Vs. Financial Engineering, and Their Roles in Financial Crises

The first step on the index funds journey is to recognize active investor behavior. If all investors were lined up in a row, could the active investors be identified? Active investors actively engage in stock picking, time picking (market timing), manager picking, and style picking.

Step 1: Active Investors - Podcast Interview with Mark Hebner

Mark Hebner explains the Nobel Laureates. Mark suggests a higher power of non-biased information from academics who carefully analyze data and have that data peer reviewed before it is published. Mark identifies the five basic concepts of the Modern Portfolio Theory.

Step 2: Nobel Laureates - Podcast Interview with Mark Hebner

see more investing videos...

In The News

The Venture Capital Myth
The Hidden Message in JP Morgan's $2 Billion Loss
The Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation Report on Venture Capital Funds: A Cautionary Tale
Investor Confidence in UBS May be Misplaced
A Rational Response to Irrational Market Anxiety
Mal-location of Capital
Wall Street: the other Las Vegas


Quote of the Week

Sign Up for IFA's Quote of the Week

email:

Breaking Down the Style ETFs

IndexFunds.com Staff
Monday, June 23, 2003

Investors who use index-linked exchange-traded funds to slice and dice various parts of the U.S. market can choose from benchmarks from Russell, S&P/Barra, and Dow Jones. Since each index family is governed by its own unique set of rules, they can at times perform differently, especially in volatile markets.

"Sometimes you'll see significant divergence in style indices, especially those from S&P/Barra and Russell," said Brad Pope, head of index strategy and research at Barclays Global Investors. "A lot of this has to do with reconstitution methodology. Russell reconstitutes its growth and value indices once a year; S&P/Barra does it twice. Let's say there's some major market movement between June and December. When the S&P/Barra indexes reconstitute, they may have a whole different set of stocks than Russell does in the style indices. This has happened periodically in the past."

BGI manages iShares based on the Russell and S&P/Barra indexes, while State Street Global Advisors offers four ETFs tied to the Dow Jones Style indexes.

Large-Cap Value ETFs
ETF
Ticker
2001
2002
YTD (as of 6/13/03)
iShares Russell 1000 Value
-6.3%
-16.2%
11.8%
streetTRACKS Dow Jones U.S. Large Cap Value
-5.6%
-18.0%
12.4%
iShares S&P/Barra 500 Value
-11.5%
-21.5%
14.5%

 

Large-Cap Growth ETFs
ETF
Ticker
2001
2002
YTD (as of 6/13/03)
iShares Russell 1000 Growth
-20.8%
-28.1%
13.4%
streetTRACKS Dow Jones U.S. Large Cap Growth
-25.9%
-32.1%
13.1%
iShares S&P/Barra 500 Growth
-12.5%
-23.8%
11.5%

 

Small-Cap Value ETFs
ETF
Ticker
2001
2002
YTD (as of 6/13/03)
iShares Russell 2000 Value
13.6%
-12.9%
16.9%
streetTRACKS Dow Jones U.S. Small Cap Value
14.4%
-3.2%
14.4%
iShares S&P/Barra SmallCap 600 Value
11.7%
-14.3%
12.0%

 

Small-Cap Growth ETFs
ETF
Ticker
2001
2002
YTD (as of 6/13/03)
iShares Russell 2000 Growth
-10.1%
-30.8%
19.8%
streetTRACKS Dow Jones U.S. Small Cap Growth
-8.7%
-38.7%
20.1%
iShares S&P/Barra SmallCap 600 Growth
-1.8%
-15.3%
12.3%

Source for all: Morningstar

The index providers also have different methodologies for determining if a stock belongs in the growth or style index.

Index family
Dow Jones
Russell
S&P/Barra
# of style variables
6
2
1
Value factors
price/book, price/earnings, dividend yield, price/earnings (estimated)
book/price
book/price
Growth factors
long-term earnings growth, 5-year trailing earnings growth
long-term earnings growth
none
Reconstitution frequency
semi-annual
annual
semi-annual
Growth/Value separation
Stocks not clearly growth or value (neutral) are ommitted from style indexes.
Stocks may be in both growth and value indexes.
Each company is assigned to either the value or growth index.

 

"There is something to be said for more than one [style] factor," said Pope. "Each index provider has progressed a little further along in terms of adding factors. The S&P/Barra indices use a single factor [p/b], and a company is 100% forced into one [style or growth] index. On the other hand, Russell uses an additional factor [long-term earnings growth], while stocks can be in both the growth and value indices."

Dow Jones has gone a step further by adding more style factors - six in all. Dow Jones has also created a 'neutral' category for stocks that are not clearly growth or value. Neutral stocks are withheld from the growth and value indexes, which results in more concentrated indexes by definition.

Index providers are slowly moving away from an absolute boundary or "line in the sand" between indexes to cut down on excessive turnover. For example, Vanguard is transitioning many of its U.S. index funds to new benchmarks maintained by Morgan Stanley Capital International (MSCI) that use "buffer zones" to curb turnover. Vanguard will likely introduce new ETFs based on the MSCI style indexes, so investors may soon have even more options.

"Forced ranking or drawing a line can create index turnover that may not necessarily be productive," said BGI's Pope. "For example, a few years ago, tech companies in the [small-cap] Russell 2000 were growing at a tremendous rate and moving into the [large-cap] Russell 1000 index. As a result, many companies were pushed down into the Russell 2000. A year and half later, the exact opposite happened [when tech crashed]. The bottom line is that many companies moved into and out of an index when their market capitalization didn't vary much, rather the market had moved around them."

 


Share/Save/Bookmark

Related Articles

Thursday, February 09, 2012

Style Drifters - Science Meets Art - Show 16-3

Thursday, February 09, 2012

Style Drifters - Style Picking Doesn’t Work - Show 16-2

Thursday, February 09, 2012

Style Drifters - Your Investing Style - Show 16-1

Sunday, January 24, 2010

In Focus - Step 4: Market Timing With ETFs

Tuesday, July 29, 2003

Do Internet ETFs justify their recent run-up?

Login